Reviews Harvesters Ponsse

4.4

Average score of Ponsse

6 reviews

4.0

4.0 Price

4.8

4.8 Reliability

4.3

4.3 Maintenance

4.7

4.7 Operation

4.3

4.3 Convenience

Search results: 6 reviews

Filter

Add a review

4.6

Harvester Ponsse Ergo

2016 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

Tried out the Ponsse Ergo recently, and I gotta say, the cab design is pretty user-oriented. The rotating seat and ample space make extended use more comfortable, though encountering the cab on slopes did pose some minor issues. Stability features perform admirably, but I wasn't thrilled with the storage adjustments due to system upgrades. It’s a solid machine for medium to heavy workloads.

4.4

Harvester Ponsse Ergo

2007 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

This harvester gets the job done effectively. I found the extended boom reach pretty useful for accessing hard-to-reach logs. However, its size can sometimes be a challenge on tighter paths, so planning ahead is key. Overall, a sturdy and reliable machine.

4.2

Harvester Ponsse Ergo

2019 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

I put in over a thousand hours on the Ergo this year. It’s a solid harvester, does fine on long shifts without needing to refuel, big tank makes a difference. The tilt cab is cool, helps when working on hills or rough spots, but takes a bit to get used to if you’ve been driving old machines. No big issues with reliability so far, keeps chugging along. Hydraulic system's solid, but changing the fluid is a messy job every single time. The control layout is okay, not my favorite, but I can reach everything I need to. Wish there was a bit more space in the cab, it’s okay but a bit tight for storing gear. Didn’t notice any crazy fuel savings from the injection system but not burning more than other machines either. All in all, it's a workhorse, just not perfect.

4.6

Harvester Ponsse Ergo

2015 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

I’ve driven the Ponsse Ergo on various terrains. The C5 telescopic crane excels with its reach and power, although it does require some periodic maintenance which may disrupt schedules slightly. Hose layout improvements are noticeable and facilitate quicker interventions. For early thinnings, visibility could be better around the crane setup. However, excellent engine performance balances out such nuances.

4.4

Harvester Ponsse Scorpion

2015 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Translated automatically

Short take from someone who runs harvesters full season: productivity is up. The machine moves smooth, cycles faster and Opti‑5G keeps setups simple so you waste less time fiddling. They talked energy-efficient drives and that should cut fuel use; early signs are good but I want months of data. Availability looks ok, Ponsse has done volume before and parts network seems covered. Downsides - 5G sounds great but in real remote patches you’ll still rely on local systems, so don’t expect cloud magic everywhere. Price? Ask your dealer, not on the briefing. For training rookies the Active Crane is gold, they learn faster and hit acceptable production sooner. All in all more productivity, cautious on connectivity and real fuel numbers.