Agroline » Reviews » Claas »

Claas reviews

4.3

Average score of Claas

31 reviews

3.9

3.9 Price

4.5

4.5 Reliability

4.1

4.1 Maintenance

4.5

4.5 Operation

4.5

4.5 Convenience

Search results: 31 reviews

Filter

Add a review

4.4

Grain harvester Claas Lexion

2011 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

The Claas Lexion delivers a reliable performance in the field. Handling the controls feels intuitive, though the initial setup may require time to familiarize.

4.2

Grain harvester Claas Lexion

2009 Year

3.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Got my hands on the Lexion 770, the one with the Perkins engine. I spend long days in the field and honestly, the power is plenty. The 12.5L has more than enough grunt. What surprised me was how easy it is to do daily maintenance. Motor access is wide open, just use the ladder - nothing blocks you. Radiator swings out easy, air filter pops off without any tool. You can check everything in a few minutes before starting. But some covers and ladders still could be sturdier, feels a bit rattly at times after a few seasons. Night lights for maintenance are useful. These small details make a difference when you are dead tired. Not much to complain about except maybe the price - these machines are never cheap, but at least the engine is solid.

4.6

Grain harvester Claas Lexion

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

We have all imported equipment, but this season Lexions from Klaas showed themselves especially well. We bought them recently, last year. For a long time we were looking for a powerful and productive combine with a wide-cut header, because the yield is high, 50-55 kg ha and more. The Lexions proved to be great.

4.8

Grain harvester Claas Scorpion

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

We have a lot of equipment from different brands. But the most irreplaceable and most inconspicuous is the Claas loader. Scorpion. Works all year round. We have him and a crane and a stacker and a loader. He plows for three. A terrible dream that he will break. But so far I have never been idle for three seasons. If we are afraid of what the dealer advises us. And the dealer works fine, we even bought a Jaguar harvester. If we do not burn ourselves, then we will translate all the equipment into claas.

4.2

Forage harvester Claas Jaguar 950

2015 Year

3.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

This forage harvester is impressive in its reliability and operation execution. The engine power ensures continuous performance, but I find the cost of maintenance a bit steep.

2.8

Wheel tractor Claas Xerion 3300

2005 Year

3.0 Price

2.0 Reliability

3.0 Maintenance

3.0 Operation

3.0 Convenience

The only good thing about the Claas Xerion 3300 tractor is its design, that's it. The cabin is cramped, so you can't fit through any gates if you compare it to a John Deere. And I don't understand why these tractors are praised so much. The engine is powerful, but it consumes diesel like crazy. They stuffed it with so much electronics that after rain and mud, it starts glitching, which is totally unacceptable for such tractors. The automatic gearbox broke before the warranty expired, and it has already cost a fortune to fix it at the agricultural firm. John Deere wouldn't have had so many problems in 10 years of use.

3.6

Grain harvester Claas Mercator 75

3.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

3.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

I was considering buying the Mercator 75 combine harvester from Claas, but first I decided to talk to specialists from other cities and find out their opinion about this machine. 2 out of 3 people said that it was, to put it mildly, an unsuccessful choice in terms of performance and finding spare parts. They recommended buying the Dominator 85 instead. I'm still undecided, but most likely I'll go with the second option.

4.4

Grain harvester Claas Mega 208

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

3.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

We have been using the Mega 208 combine for 9 years. The machine paid for itself within 2 years of purchase. If you need high labor productivity in the field, choose this model. Just take the quality of diesel fuel and oil seriously, otherwise you will go bankrupt on repairs. As for small consumables, we made the decision to stock up on them 4 years ago. At the moment, we have used about a third of them.

4.4

Grain harvester Claas Mega 360

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Every year I go to Poland for seasonal work. I have to work on the Claas Mega 360 combine harvester. The machine is far from new, but it handles its functions excellently - without any downtime, it completes the season of harvesting sunflowers and grain crops. If you organize the work process correctly, you can mow 8 hectares of working area, with a replacement threshing drum - up to 70 tons of grain.

3.6

Grain harvester Claas Lexion

2011 Year

3.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

3.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Worked a Lexion a couple harvests ago. APS and Roto Plus systems handle a ton of crop - didn’t see it even slow down when stuff got thick. Can switch from straw chopping to spreading out of the cab, saves a bunch of time, that’s nice when you’re on your own. Had some hassle with the straw chopper bearings once, nothing major but you gotta keep an eye on it. I’d say reliability is solid, but do watch wear parts, especially after heavy runs. Controls are a mixed bag, lotta settings, can take a bit to figure them all out. Pricewise, what do you expect from new gear? Never gonna be cheap, but it's on par with what you get.